I think problems are only problems if you don’t have a solution.
If you have a solution, the problem goes away.
All problems are people problems. They begin at an individual level, whether they’re rational problems or not.
The more individuals who believe it’s a problem, the greater consensus arises that it’s a problem. I would say all problems have a solution.
Most problems are misidentified.
The problem isn’t the problem, it’s usually how you think about the problem. Thinking is the problem.
Irrational attachment and misaligned expectations are the source of most problems, if not all problems.
Change happens. Letting go of the past or the old is apart of being adaptable. It’s the essence of evolution and survival. Those who can’t do this suffer.
I think death is not a problem. Or at least, not the way we’ve pathologized death.
I think the fear of death is a greater problem.
Granted, death is an existential problem. The greatest.
But when you come to terms with death, with loss, with finality, I think this is where the mind begins to see possibility and potential in wondrous ways.
Also, reconciling what’s inside our minds (internal expectations) with what we’re perceiving (external impressions).
This is a great source of suffering and problems, which closely relates to our tendency to attach to things, be it tangibles such as material possessions or loved ones, or intangibles, such as belief or identity or ideas/opinions.
What is in our mind is not a perfect representation of the world.
Understanding that dissonance or suffering is not a problem in the world but a problem of perception, within the mind, is a great step to liberation. Listening to our feelings, exploring the contents of our perceptions, being mindful about “what is” vs “what we think it is”.
Stoicism is very helpful in this regard.
A baked turkey is either a delicious meal, or a burnt carcass. A blanket is soft or rough depending on what it’s relative to.
Objective thought is the goal, but it requires distancing the subjective moral evaluations of good or bad.
There is a hierarchy of values built into every culture and individual psychology based on personal experiences relative to given experiences and available perceived options.
Many times the mind cannot escape what’s given, and is hostage to making judgements based on the narrow evaluations available to us via experience and culture.
The ability to be objective and evaluate ideas and experiences on a granular basis, based on basic sense data and natural unbiased observations, allows us to see how everything fits into a bigger picture.
For instance, you have a culture that endorses eye for an eye. This is justice. Perpetuate vengeance. It makes sense if there is limited options available. This is a scarcity mindset.
A better culture would be forgiveness. There is opportunity cost associated with vengeance. The time and energy to seek justice may be more valuable than the justice you seek. Forgive and devote time and energy into building anew, rather than destroying the bad.
Everything just “is”. There is no supreme moral hierarchy that exists. Every culture and mind brings it to reality.
Prior to human civilization, shit lived and died. Countless species lived for hundreds of thousands or millions of years, and died. No one cared. Dust to dust. No moral outrage about justice.
What is good or bad is a human dilemma revolving around what it means to self-preserve.
These are culturally transmitted, and not representative of “what is”.
We’re animals. We respond to pleasure and pain. We respond to our unconscious culturally programmed bias about is good or bad.
Part of cleaving from the herd, or the mob mentality characterizing tribalism and society at large, is learning to disassociate with these biases, and really investigating the contents of these impulsive reactions to perceptions and stimuli.
All pain is not bad.
All pleasure is not good.
The highest ideals, for me, is truth and love.
Truth to see reality or the contents of our perceptions for what is, to align with the present and observe what is in its most natural form, unadulterated by bias and feeling. This involves courage, curiosity, and work.
Love is to see the humanity in all living things, and cultivate that through modeling behaviors that promote collaboration and trust and honesty and compassion.
No man is an island.
Humanity is stronger when its unified. It’s also weaker.
At the end it’s about identifying the right ideals to unify around, to manifest individual flourishing that promotes diversity of thought without fragmented tribalism.
At the end of the day, imagination and creativity is an almost spiritual source of power.
The ability to conceive alternative possibilities is crucial for problem solving, from escaping fixed or scarcity mindset.
There is always more than meets the eye.
You can create the way. Past solutions aren’t always adequate for present problems/challenges.
Faith is also crucial.
Faith that there is possibility beyond current perception.
I used to be skeptical about the word faith, because of religious connotations.
But now I see that it’s absolutely fundamental for creation, for imagining possibilities yet-to-be.
Faith in vision. Faith in something that is yet-to-exist.
Faith is powerful. You don’t need to rationalize forward to an answer. You act toward your goal, learn along the way, and reconstruct rationality with hindsight.
But this isn’t indicative there was an inherent logic along the way.
Logic exists in the mind. It’s a powerful tool. But it is bound by experience and current assumptions.
But I think imagination and creativity are more powerful.
Obviously both are helpful. Logic is more helpful for communication than anything. It allows others to understand.
But a spiritual conviction arising from a creative insight about a yet-to-be possibility may not have a rational narrative. Not until it’s complete.
Most “problems” are a result of a lack of imagination, a lack of faith in alternative possibilities.
Wherever our attention goes, the energy flows.
I actually think emotions are rather simple and primitive.
I think rationalizing emotions make them complex and complicated.
The phenomenal or sensational experience is another matter.
How to adequately conceptualize a phenomenon? What is red? We can perform a series of iterative propositional statements embedded with assumptions to form a logical statement about them, but when you drill into the assumptions it becomes an ad infinitum rabbit hole of semantic interpretation and agreement.
I find most problems arise because of inaccurate or incomplete assumptions.
This is where philosophy is immensely valuable
Learning to question assumptions allows us to expand on our understanding of problems, which allow for reframing
Once the unconscious assumptions are identified and elaborated we can reframe the context of the problem and proceed with employing the powers of reason to navigate to an appropriate solution.
So long as there is change and intemperance, there will be problems, and dissonance.
Reconciling faulty assumptions embedded with outdated and inaccurate representations with the present reality is the key for creative problem solving, and a clearer more peaceful life.
Problems arise when we don’t question the assumptions built into our language.
Our unstated beliefs about the world, which exist unconsciously.
Language makes the mind, but the mind makes language.
Language tends to be fixed. The world is not; it is in constant flux and change. Updating language and the beliefs and assumptions therein is crucial for greeting the world and its challenges in the present, where they can be resolved.