In my mind, there are physical and psychological constraints.
Constraints are context dependent. In the sense that, context determines constraints. The mind, ie attention, can choose context, by expanding or contracting its focus.
Physics presents materially real constraints. Physical laws manifest through matter, which are incontrovertible.
Psychology presents perceived constraints. How we observe or perceive matter, and how it represents itself to us, is a matter of perception.
Technology is the mechanism for harnessing energy with precision to manipulate the material world to produce intended effects.
In practice, technology is the mediator between the mind and the world, allowing the mind to transpose it’s intention into the world, and the world to transpose relevant information back onto us, in a structured way.
Technology requires energy, requires an architect, and a first mover. Technology is not yet autonomous and self replicating, i.e. not sentient life.
Psychological constraints determine the models and systems we creatively design and build, by constraining our conception of what’s possible via the contents of our mind, wrought from culture and observable experience.
By expanding knowledge and understanding, through the process of data collection via symbolic systems and observation, which we creatively synthesize with our intention through reflection, we enlarge the possible.
However, despite how clever we continually enlarge this possibility and remove psychological constraints, we will forever contend with physical laws, and the inherent constraints they contain. Even the mind is bound by physical constraints, being a byproduct of the brain, which contends with a host of physical necessities.
Technology will always be the bridge that mediates our ability to manipulate the physical world, beyond the physical capacities of the flesh.