Science is basically collecting and analyzing data. Scientists are just data scientists.
“Data Science” is this like.. buzz word. I took a class this past semester. I feel like it’s just being applied to businesses and so now it’s getting trendy, and beyond Excel Spreadsheets.
Like businesses are collecting more data than ever through their ERP and CRM software.
It’s no longer basic records keeping and accounting. It’s leveraging data points to visualize a story of a business and its mechanics and character and health and trajectory.
I played with Microstrategy a lot the past month. Really cool data science tool. Free too.
But data is like so damn important.
You’re blind without it.
Collecting data is important. Identifying the right data to collect. Then analyzing it.
Maybe everyone is this chat is like duh mike.
But there are these crazy tools. Having data is not important. It’s using tools to identify the relationships within the data that reveal the inner workings of activity
Data is generated by activity. Collecting information over time and storing it in accessible ways. I feel like my statistics classes were kinda worthless. I took a statistics and probabilities class. And then an economics statistics class.
Both were just like memorizing formulas to apply to data sets. You were tested on knowing which formula to apply to a question and data.
But that shit wasn’t helpful. I forgot it immediately. I remember some abstract fundamentals it taught.
But there was little obvious crossover to the real world. Or maybe I’m just an idiot.
We’re in the 21st century. Like data is in tables, in spreadsheets, stored on computers.
I did learn a fair bit on excel as an economics major, but I should have been taught some computer languages like SQL or R or something or python or something that’s powerful.
Generating K-means? Bayesian modeling? Optimization modeling? Cluster analysis? Regression? Model? Ensemble models? Forecasting? Outlier detection?
Instead in economic theory classes they teach you these god forsaken formulas to memorize and apply to convoluted abstract questions. Very limited data sets.
Which in the real world, is all you’re working with. You’re building up from raw data sets. Your boss hands you data and says: your job is to make sense of this and make smart decisions. Or your business spits out data and you’re like: how on earth do I determine a signal from the noise?
I’m not even talking about dirty disorganized data and the process of cleaning and scrubbing to make it intelligible to analytic tools.
I feel like an education should teach you ways to make sense of noise, of lots of data, to spot patterns, to apply tools that reveal patterns.
In theory it does that
I feel like it just missed the computer technology tool side of it
All Maths and science subjects should have a heavy emphasis on data computation and analysis
Okay. We have a pen and paper. We don’t have to use our hands or a pen and paper.
Not we have an abacus.
Now we have a calculator.
Now we have a computer.
Like. Use these things.
Why walk when you can ride a bike? When you can drive? When you can fly???
Now, I’m not saying english or philsophy or other humanities classes are a waste. I am a big fan of the humanities. I feel like peer discussion is crucial for contextualizing their cultural and social significance. My philosophy studies would not be the same if it weren’t for my professors and peers. I also think Vandy had a phenomenal philosophy department. I feel fortunate. It made me a better thinker, better at critical thinking, at asking questions. English classes too.
But I am super disappointed by the current atmosphere of the humanities… this critical theory element that’s infiltrated… its cancerous. And it actually makes people dumber.
But, in a perfect world, exposure to the hunanities is crucial for a well balanced mind.
I just wish there was a greater emphasis on practical tools analytic tools. Not just formulas.
Formulas are abstract models representing relationships within a conceptual scheme. It takes a fuck ton of mental work to apply abstract generalizations to the concrete particulars of our daily problems.
Our brain is a computer, but for all it’s horsepower, it’s largely operating unconsciously. Our subconscious has enormous computational power. It makes zillions of calculations and inferences to guide our behavior.
But most of that power is inaccessible to our conscious experience.
This is why technology is so powerful.
(Greek word “techne” meaning art. Derived from Indo Proto European root word “tetk” meaning “create, produce”)
Technology allows us to leverage the this power. It’s intimately tied to science and mathematics.The fundamentals of reasoning.
Modern and Analytic philsophy is particularoy fascinating: Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Kant… then the guys who expanded mathematical logic like Russell, Moore, Frege.
They all explored the basic justifications of reason.
I understand at first glace philosophy does not appear explicitly practical.
It mostly teaches you to perceive more than meets the eye. To question assumptions.
Studying philosophy is less about learning to know.
It’s more about learning that you don’t know.
Which is super helpful in life, because you learn to ask more questions in order to identify the limits of your understanding assuming, so you don’t make decisions based on erroneous or partial or inaccurate information/beliefs etc.
Economics was not practical at all. And it barely taught me tools of reason. It was purely an intellectual exercise.
It seemed like a good idea. It’s kind of businessy. I figured prospective employers would find it a attractive
In hindsight I regret not studying physics or engineering.
Reallly wish I studied physics or engineering in hindsight. But thats why I’m studying it now.